Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpHhKXAu/Ex15_Luc98

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(active(X1), X2, X3)
PROPER(from(X)) → FROM(proper(X))
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(active(X1), X2)
ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(active(X1), X2)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → AND(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(proper(X1), proper(X2))
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → AND(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(active(X1), X2, X3)
PROPER(from(X)) → FROM(proper(X))
ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(active(X1), X2)
ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(active(X1), X2)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → AND(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(proper(X1), proper(X2))
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → AND(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 10 SCCs with 21 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

ADD(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3
IF(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 3 > 3

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
AND(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(and(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(add(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(if(X1, X2, X3)) → PROPER(X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

ACTIVE(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
ACTIVE(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [15] with a polynomial ordering [25], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [17] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

No dependency pairs are removed.

No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(TOP(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 2·x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(ok(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(proper(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(true) = 0

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = 1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(ok(x₁)) = x₁
POL(proper(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 1
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(true) → ok(true)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
proper(and(X1, X2)) → and(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(add(X1, X2)) → add(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(false) = 1
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(ok(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(true) = 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(and(X1, X2)) → and(active(X1), X2)
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
add(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(add(X1, X2))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
and(mark(X1), X2) → mark(and(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(TOP(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + 2·x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 2 + 2·x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(ok(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))
and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(and(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(add(X1, X2)) → add(active(X1), X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → mark(add(X1, X2))

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(TOP(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + 2·x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = 2 + x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(ok(x₁)) = 2·x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RuleRemovalProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.